Managing Type 2 Diabetes: New Guidelines are Transforming Medication Use Monograph Reducing Opioid-Related Harms: A Role for Pharmacists Evaluation

Managing Type 2 Diabetes: New Guidelines are Transforming Medication Use Monograph Reducing Opioid-Related Harms: A Role for Pharmacists Evaluation

Objectives

Content

Faculty

Credibility

Join our newsletter

Name*
First Last
Name as it should appear on certificate*
Email*
What is your profession?*
- Physician (AMA)
- Nursing (ANCC)
- Certificate of Attendance
How long did it take you to complete this activity?
Hours*
HH:MM
Objectives
The course met the stated learning objectives:
Define an HbA1c target: 7% for most patients, modifying the goal (to <8.5%) for many frail older patients.*
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Select initial treatment based on relevant comorbidities and HbA1c lowering need.*
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Identify patients 1.5% or more above their goal to initiate treatment with two medications, within weeks of diagnosis.*
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Revise treatment, adding insulin when other agents are not sufficient to achieve HbA1c goal.*
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Plan to continuously promote weight control, exercise, and adherence to medications.*
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Content
Please rate your level of agreement with the following statements. This activity…
Helped me to have a better understanding of the topic(s).*
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Assisted me to consider using the information in a different way to improve my practice.*
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Provided me with resources I can use in my daily practice or with my patients.*
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Will support my routine clinical practice to deliver evidence-based, best practice that improves patient health outcomes.*
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Faculty
Please rate the quality of the faculty, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor).
Alexander Chaitoff M.D., M.P.H.*
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Jerry Avorn, M.D.*
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Benjamin N. Rome, M.D., M.P.H.*
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Dawn Whitney, M.S.N./Ed., R.N.*
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Ellen Dancel, PharmD, M.P.H.*
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Credibility
Will you change the way you practice based on this activity?*
- Yes
- No
Do you feel the activity was balanced and objective?*
- Yes
- No
Do you feel the activity was free of commercial bias?*
- Yes
- No
Approximately what percent of this content was NEW to you?*
As compared to other CME activities you have participated in the past six months, do you believe this activity:*
- Increased your knowledge
- Will improve patient outcomes in your practice
What I liked about this activity…? (Select all that apply)*
- It allowed me to interact with my peers and faculty
- It provided feedback throughout the activity
- It provided information in ways that I can review again later
- It gave me the opportunity to apply information to realistic scenarios that I confront in my practice
- It facilitated the sharing of experiences and best practices
In the past six months, how many CME programs have you participated in?*
What was the most useful information you gained from this activity?
Suggested topics for future activities:
General comments/suggestions:

Clinical Relevance

Teaching Strategies

Level of Expertise