CVS Caremark 2021 Specialty National Sales Meeting

Step 1 of 5

Clinical Relevance

Teaching Strategies

Level of Expertise

Faculty

Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor).
Danielle Blackman
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Rachel Clifton
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Greg Gonzales
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Dwight Hall
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Joel Helle
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Jennifer Huntley
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Kathryn Johnson
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Kris Kenny
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Olga Korsunsky
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Russell Lewis
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Rusty Lewis
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)

Dominick Major
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Jeff Mattiucci
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Emily Pefanis
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Linda Rivera
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Martin Rozycki
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Christine Sawicki
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Terri Sroka
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Christine Walsh
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Cassandra Worthy
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)

Credibility
Will you change the way you practice based on this activity?*

Yes

No
Do you feel the activity was balanced and objective?*

Yes

No
Do you feel the activity was free of commercial bias?*

Yes

No
Approximately what percent of this content was NEW to you?*

25%

50%

75%

This was all new information to me.
As compared to other CME activities you have participated in the past six months, do you believe this activity:
Increased your knowledge
Will improve patient outcomes in your practice
What I liked about this activity…? (Select all that apply)
It allowed me to interact with my peers and faculty
It provided feedback throughout the activity
It provided information in ways that I can review again later
It gave me the opportunity to apply information to realistic scenarios that I confront in my practice
It facilitated the sharing of experiences and best practices
Suggested Topics for future activities:
In the past six months, how many CME programs have you participated in?

1-4

5 - 10

11 - 15

Greater than 15
General comments/suggestions:
What was the most useful information you gained from this activity?

Join our newsletter

Stay up to date on new CME Outfitters activities, breaking news, and important developments in medical education.

Name*
First Last
Email*

Name
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Since 2002, CME Outfitters has delivered innovative evidence-based educational activities to thousands of clinicians each year and offers expert accreditation and outcome services for non-accredited organizations.

Courses

Free CE/CME

Conferences

Live Activities

On-Demand Activities

Digital Hubs

Podcast Episodes

Patient Education

Pharmacist Central

Services

Joint Providership

Outcomes

Meeting Management

Government Contracts

About Us

Overview

CMEO Blog

Press Room

Podcast Episodes

DEI Policies

© CME Outfitters 2025

Privacy Policy

Terms