CVS Caremark 2021 PBM National Sales Meeting

CVS Caremark 2021 PBM National Sales Meeting

Step 1 of 5

Step 1 of 5

Join our newsletter

Faculty

Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor).
Lucille Accetta
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Jeremy Basedow
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Jill Belinky
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Kim Boian
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Maura Buxton
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Cheryl Byron
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Sree Chaguturu
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Lara Church
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Kamie Clark-Moen
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Angele D'Amico
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Kavita Dave
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
David Dross
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Duyen Duong
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Bryan Eberhardt
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Nikki Flynn
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Tierra Ford
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Jack Gierat
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Tom Gilson
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Erika Glenn
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Jeff Goddard
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Scott Gottlieb
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Chris Harlow
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Ahmed Hassan
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Charles Hughes
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Jack Kiley
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Ryan Kuehn
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Tricia Lacavich
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Cindy Leisey
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Tammy Lewis
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Alan Lotvin
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Ted Loya
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)

Jonathan Mayhew
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Tracey McGuire
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Eric Michael
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Jeremy Mueller
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Jared Northrop
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Cindy Pigg
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Brian Roman
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Steve Schaper
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Melissa Schulman
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Prem Shah
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Alvah Stahlnecker
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Andrew Sutton
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Nick Taylor
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Barb Turkovich
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Carolyn Wiesenhahn
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)
Chris Wilson
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)

Credibility
Will you change the way you practice based on this activity?*

Yes

No
Do you feel the activity was balanced and objective?*

Yes

No
Do you feel the activity was free of commercial bias?*

Yes

No
Approximately what percent of this content was NEW to you?*

25%

50%

75%

This was all new information to me.
As compared to other CME activities you have participated in the past six months, do you believe this activity:
Increased your knowledge
Will improve patient outcomes in your practice
What I liked about this activity…? (Select all that apply)
It allowed me to interact with my peers and faculty
It provided feedback throughout the activity
It provided information in ways that I can review again later
It gave me the opportunity to apply information to realistic scenarios that I confront in my practice
It facilitated the sharing of experiences and best practices
Suggested Topics for future activities:
In the past six months, how many CME programs have you participated in?

1-4

5 - 10

11 - 15

Greater than 15
General comments/suggestions:
What was the most useful information you gained from this activity?

Clinical Relevance

Teaching Strategies

Level of Expertise