Evaluation for Reflective Writing: A Tool for Self-Compassion

Evaluation for Reflective Writing: A Tool for Self-Compassion

Evaluation for Reflective Writing: A Tool for Self-Compassion

Objectives

Content

Faculty

Credibility

Objectives

Content

Faculty

Credibility

Press Releases

Featured Posts

Recent Posts

Most Viewed

Press Releases

Featured Posts

Recent Posts

Most Viewed

Join our newsletter

News Article

Publish Date

August 6, 2020

Author

Amanda Sewell

Categories

Activity Evaluations

Name*
First Last
What is your profession?
- Physician
- Nurse Practitioner
- Physician Assistant
- Nurse
- Social Worker
- Other
Name as it should appear on certificate*
Email*
How long did it take you to complete this activity?
Hours*
HH:MM
Objectives
The course met the stated objectives
Have increased confidence in their ability to engage in reflective writing*
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Have gained experience and proficiency in close reading*
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Have learned the essential elements of establishing a simple reflective writing practice for use at home and/or at work*
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Understand the meaning of self-compassion and develop strategies for a self-compassion practice*
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Content
Please rate your level of agreement with the following statements. This activity…
Helped me to have a better understanding of the topic(s).*
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Assisted me to consider using the information in a different way to improve my practice.*
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Provided me with resources I can use in my daily practice or with my patients.*
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Will support my routine clinical practice to deliver evidence-based, best practice that improves patient health outcomes.*
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Faculty
Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor).
Elizabeth Mitchell, MD*
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Sarah Wingerter, MD*
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Content
Clinical Relevance
Teaching Strategies
Level of Expertise
Credibility
Will you change the way you practice based on this activity?*
- Yes
- No
Do you feel the activity was balanced and objective?*
- Yes
- No
Do you feel the activity was free of commercial bias?*
- Yes
- No
How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?*
1 (Very little) 2 3 4 5 (A great deal)
How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?*
1 (Not useful) 2 3 4 5 (Extremely useful)
Approximately what percent of this content was NEW to you?*
As compared to other CME activities you have participated in the past six months, do you believe this activity:*
- Increased your knowledge
- Will improve patient outcomes in your practice
What I liked about this activity…? (Select all that apply)*
- It allowed me to interact with my peers and faculty
- It provided feedback throughout the activity
- It provided information in ways that I can review again later
- It gave me the opportunity to apply information to realistic scenarios that I confront in my practice
- It facilitated the sharing of experiences and best practices
In the past six months, how many CME programs have you participated in?*
What was the most useful information you gained from this activity?
Suggested Topics for future activities:
General comments/suggestions:

Clinical Relevance

Teaching Strategies

Level of Expertise